Critterion essay grader word count how to#

It is often the contradictions in an individual’s character that give it distinction in the case of Orwell, these were more marked and more numerous than in most, but it is not clear whether he was even aware of them.

The contradictions have frequently been noted: he was a socialist intellectual whose finest achievements included a mordant critique of the hypocrisy and double standards displayed by the socialist intellectuals of his day a patriot who held most of his country’s institutions in contempt a passionate defender of historical truth who chose to write under an assumed name and who occasionally told lies a self-styled champion of decency who backed causes that, had they prevailed, would have produced outcomes in which decency would have been difficult to discern an atheist who decreed that his funeral should be conducted by the Church of England and that he should be buried in a rural parish churchyard.

Despite his strong moral sense, these contradictions also imply a degree of moral obtuseness and even confusion, and it is these which in large part explain our fascination with him. His personality was too modest and austere to assert, as Walt Whitman did, “Do I contradict myself?/ Very well then I contradict myself,/ (I am large, I contain multitudes).” But the contradictions abound, confirming Muggeridge’s view that Orwell was not the unblinkered and straight-thinking observer he believed himself to be. It is the contradictions in Orwell’s character that provide the key to understanding the enduring fascination with his thought and work.

Critterion essay grader word count how to#

How to account for the enduring interest in Orwell’s life and work? Orwell’s friend Malcolm Muggeridge believed that while Orwell displayed “an almost painful honesty,” his grasp of what was going on in the world was often more than a little tenuous. There is no doubting the clarity and vigor of his prose, but when it comes to assessing his capacity to face up to grim truths, there is good reason to doubt Orwell’s claims to his having looked reality unflinchingly in the eye and told it like it was. Nor does Orwell’s own estimation of his strengths-which he described as the capacity to write clearly combined with an unusual ability to face up to unpalatable truths-provide a satisfactory explanation. But I do not think this gets to the heart of the matter. How to account for the enduring interest in Orwell’s life and work? Quite obviously, part of the explanation is that, quite rarely, he has admirers on both the right and left of the political spectrum and that he wrote two of the most influential novels of the twentieth century, containing words and phrases-“Big Brother,” “Newspeak,” “Doublethink,” “Memory hole,” etc.-that have entered the political lexicon, reflecting and shaping the anxieties and fears of his own and subsequent generations. The publisher, one of several who plan to take advantage of the ending of copyright protection on Orwell’s published writings on January 1 this year, also plans to bring out new editions of Orwell’s five novels in the coming months. Taylor, the author of Orwell: The Life, which won the Whitbread prize for biography in 2003 and is rightly regarded as the best of the bunch, has been commissioned by Constable to write what is described as a “completely fresh” second biography to appear in 2023. To date, there are at least five biographies-although Orwell requested that none should be written-as well as memoirs, letters, essays, and academic studies. But since the flow of publications about Orwell continues unabated, it may only be a matter of time before he overtakes both. Review papers that are on the borderline a second time before assigning a final grade.B y my unscientific count, more words have been written about George Orwell than any other writer in the English language besides Dickens and Shakespeare.These include handwriting and writing style bias, the length of the response, and the inclusion of irrelevant material. Beware of negative influences that can affect essay scoring.If an important decision like an award or scholarship is based on the score for the essay, obtain two or more independent readers.Again, consistency will be increased if you grade the same item on all the papers in one sitting. Avoid interruptions when scoring a specific question.This helps ensure that you use the same thinking and standards for all students. Some teachers have students put numbers on their essays to try and help with this. Determine what you are looking for and how many points you will be assigning for each aspect of the question. With the analytic system, you list specific pieces of information and award points for their inclusion. With the holistic grading system, you evaluate the answer as a whole, rating papers against each other. Determine whether you will use a holistic or analytic scoring system before you write your rubric.